Cases8000554/2025

Claimant v Scottish Autism

7 January 2026Before Employment Judge N M HosieScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Struck out under rule 38 for non-compliance with Tribunal rules and orders (rule 38(1)(c)) and for failure to actively pursue the claim (rule 38(1)(d)). The claimant failed to provide written reasons or request a hearing after being given the opportunity by the Tribunal on 03 November 2025 with a deadline of 10 November 2025.

Facts

Miss Binnersley brought a claim against Scottish Autism. On 03 November 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 November 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide any acceptable reason.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on two grounds: non-compliance with the Procedure Rules and Tribunal orders (rule 38(1)(c)), and failure to actively pursue the claim (rule 38(1)(d)).

Practical note

Claimants must respond to tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk having the claim struck out for non-compliance and non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
8000554/2025
Decision date
7 January 2026
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Claimant representation

Represented
No