Quantum Benchmarking

Award distributions from 1,468 contested hearings where compensation was awarded. Use these figures to benchmark potential award ranges for case valuation and settlement advice.

Overall award summary

£4,965
Median
The middle value — half of all awards are below this figure
£12,811
Mean
The average — pulled higher by a small number of large awards
£1,870
25th percentile
25% of awards fall below this figure
£13,270
75th percentile
Only 25% of awards exceed this figure
£27,574
90th percentile
Only 10% of awards exceed this figure

Award distribution

Under £1,000
215
£1,000–£5,000
521
£5,000–£10,000
287
£10,000–£20,000
201
£20,000–£50,000
176
£50,000–£100,000
50
£100,000+
18

Award as weeks' pay

Where salary data is available, how many weeks' gross pay does the total award represent? This divides the total award (including all heads of loss — compensatory, basic, injury to feelings, etc.) by the claimant's gross weekly pay as stated in the judgment. It is a rough measure of award scale relative to earnings, not a calculation of compensatory loss.

13.9
Median weeks
the middle value
22.4
Mean weeks
higher due to large awards
4.932.4
Typical range
25th to 75th percentile
206
Cases
with salary data available

Cases where the ratio exceeds 200 weeks are excluded as likely data extraction errors. Salary figures are as stated in the judgment and may reflect gross pay at termination, which may differ from pay at the time of the award calculation.

Awards by claim type

Success rates and award ranges for each claim type. Withdrawn and struck-out claims are excluded. Award figures show the total case award where this claim type was present, not the award attributable to the individual claim. Minimum 5 claims to appear.

Claim typeDeterminedSuccess rateMedian case awardMean case award
Automatic Unfair Dismissal37311.8%£5,232£15,688
Breach of Contract89156.1%£6,439£12,194
Constructive Dismissal35722.1%£15,165£18,795
Detriment21411.7%£3,365£20,193
Direct Discrimination150611.2%£9,617£19,697
Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)64217.1%£13,633£22,372
Equal Pay2711.1%£6,257£14,050
Failure to Inform & Consult26192.3%£5,992£9,268
Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments53519.3%£12,779£18,211
Harassment79817.2%£7,366£16,704
Holiday Pay59269.6%£3,890£11,050
Indirect Discrimination17811.2%£7,299£11,612
Interim Relief701.4%£16,228£16,228
National Minimum Wage1952.6%£1,578£13,406
Redundancy Pay25359.7%£7,973£13,128
Unfair Dismissal128839.6%£10,774£22,817
Unlawful Deduction from Wages133963.1%£3,386£9,113
Victimisation45915.9%£12,967£17,113
Whistleblowing28413.0%£5,000£11,406
Working Time Regulations1931.6%£1,002£17,691
Wrongful Dismissal32449.4%£6,357£17,164
Other26744.6%£3,236£18,134

Injury to feelings — Vento bands

Injury to feelings awards across 173 cases. The Vento bands (as updated annually by the Presidents of Employment Tribunals) provide the framework, but actual awards vary by the seriousness of the discrimination.

173
Total ITF awards
£10,000
Median ITF award
99
Lower band
£1,200–£12,100
Less serious cases
53
Middle band
£12,100–£36,400
Serious cases not meriting upper band
12
Upper band
£36,400–£60,700
Most serious cases

Band ranges shown are from the Presidents’ Guidance (eighth addendum, April 2025) and apply to claims presented on or after 6 April 2025. Exceptional cases may exceed the upper band. Each case in the data below is classified into a band based on the tribunal’s own characterisation in the judgment, not by comparing the award amount to the ranges above. Because cases span multiple years, the applicable band thresholds may differ from those shown here.

Band key:Lower (£1,200–£12,100)Middle (£12,100–£36,400)Upper (£36,400–£60,700)

Vento band distribution by discrimination type

Claim typeCasesMedian ITFLowerMiddleUpper
Direct Discrimination70£10,00038(54%)22(31%)7(10%)
Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)43£12,50019(44%)18(42%)4(9%)
Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments41£12,10018(44%)20(49%)1(2%)
Harassment52£9,50030(58%)13(25%)6(12%)
Indirect Discrimination8£8,5007(88%)1(13%)
Victimisation19£10,0009(47%)7(37%)2(11%)

Vento band distribution by protected characteristic

CharacteristicCasesMedian ITFLowerMiddleUpper
age5£2,5003(100%)
disability118£11,35057(50%)49(43%)7(6%)
gender reassignment3£10,0002(67%)1(33%)
pregnancy22£11,00012(55%)8(36%)2(9%)
race25£8,00020(80%)3(12%)2(8%)
sex27£10,00013(54%)9(38%)2(8%)
Not specified29£10,00013(46%)10(36%)5(18%)

How does representation affect outcomes?

Success rates and award ranges broken down by whether each party was represented and by the type of representative.

View Representation and Outcomes →

Looking for adjustment data?

Polkey reductions, contributory fault percentages, and ACAS Code uplifts/reductions are now on their own dedicated page with detailed breakdowns.

View Adjustments Intelligence →