Representation and Outcomes

How does the choice of representative affect tribunal outcomes? Analysis of 4,897 contested hearings showing claimant success rates and award ranges by representation status and type. All success rates refer to the claimant succeeding or partly succeeding.

Represented vs unrepresented — headline figures

Claimant representation

Claimant success rate when the claimant is represented vs unrepresented

Represented1427 cases
41% claimant success
£7,429
Unrepresented3309 cases
40% claimant success
£4,015

Respondent representation

Claimant success rate when the respondent is represented vs unrepresented

Represented3821 cases
32% claimant success
£4,660
Unrepresented906 cases
78% claimant success
£4,529

Combined representation effect

How does the combination of both parties' representation status affect outcomes? All figures show the rate at which the claimant succeeds or partly succeeds.

Representation combinationCasesClaimant success rateMedian award
Claimant unrepresented / Respondent represented253929%£3,848
Claimant represented / Respondent represented128136%£6,955
Claimant unrepresented / Respondent unrepresented75976%£4,095
Claimant represented / Respondent unrepresented14588%£9,000

By representative type

Breakdown by the type of representative. “Lay representative” includes litigation consultants, trade union representatives, HR consultants, and McKenzie friends — anyone who is not a qualified solicitor or barrister. All success rates refer to the claimant succeeding or partly succeeding.

Claimant representative type

TypeCasesClaimant successMedian award
unrepresented330940%£4,015
barrister64143%£14,733
lay rep52741%£3,722
solicitor20040%£16,118
union5634%£5,000

Respondent representative type

TypeCasesClaimant successMedian award
barrister222026%£7,222
unrepresented92478%£4,529
solicitor72328%£8,300
lay rep59548%£3,464
in house25353%£2,211
represented unknown1020%£12,679

About these figures

Figures are based on contested hearings where representation status is recorded in the published decision. Not all decisions record representation details. “Success rate” throughout this page means the rate at which the claimant succeeds or partly succeeds. Representation type categories are as recorded in the judgment — a “lay representative” may include a litigation consultant, trade union officer, HR adviser, family member, or McKenzie friend. These figures show correlation between representation and outcome, not causation — many factors beyond representation influence outcomes.