Cases3303491/2024

Claimant v Mr Thavarasa Sujanthan

5 January 2026Before Employment Judge T.R. SmithCambridgein person

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,537

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred to the respondent under TUPE on 19 February 2024. The claimant was dismissed on 25 February 2024, just days after the transfer. The tribunal concluded that the principal reason for dismissal was the transfer itself, which constitutes automatically unfair dismissal under Regulation 7 of the TUPE Regulations.

Redundancy Payfailed

As the tribunal determined that the principal reason for dismissal was the TUPE transfer (an automatically unfair reason), there was no issue of redundancy arising. The claim for redundancy pay was therefore dismissed.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The claimant was dismissed without notice. The tribunal found she was entitled to statutory notice pay because there was no written or oral contract setting out terms of notice period. With 3 full years of service, she was entitled to 3 weeks' statutory notice.

Holiday Payfailed

The claimant was not entitled to statutory holiday pay because she was unable to detail what leave had or had not been taken during the previous employment year. Without evidence of accrued but untaken leave, the claim could not succeed.

Othersucceeded

The respondent admitted that no employment particulars were provided to the claimant. The tribunal found that following the TUPE transfer, the respondent should have provided a statement of employment particulars. The claimant was awarded the minimum two weeks' pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.

Facts

The claimant worked as a shop assistant for Radhi UK Ltd from August 2020. The business (Wrentham Stores) was sold to the respondent on 19 February 2024. The claimant worked for the respondent for two days (20-21 February) and was then dismissed by text message on 25 February 2024. The respondent argued there was no employment relationship and that the claimant's employment had not transferred under TUPE. The respondent did not attend the final hearing.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred to the respondent under TUPE and that she was dismissed solely or principally because of the transfer, making it automatically unfair. She succeeded in claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and failure to provide employment particulars, but failed in claims for redundancy pay and holiday pay. Total award: £1,537.39.

Practical note

Dismissal within days of a TUPE transfer will almost certainly be found to be automatically unfair under Regulation 7, and arguments that no employment relationship exists will fail where TUPE clearly applies.

Award breakdown

Basic award£586
Notice pay£391
Loss of statutory rights£300

Award equivalent: 12.8 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

TUPE Regulations 2006 reg.3TUPE Regulations 2006 reg.4ERA 1996 s.230Working Time Regulations 1998 reg.13Employment Act 2002 s.38TUPE Regulations 2006 reg.7ERA 1996 s.108ERA 1996 s.98TUPE Regulations 2006 reg.2

Case details

Case number
3303491/2024
Decision date
5 January 2026
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Shop Assistant
Salary band
Under £15,000
Service
4 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No