Claimant v Royal Borough of Greenwich

The tribunal heard evidence over five days and found the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing explaining why the claimant did not establish less favourable treatment because of race.

The tribunal found the complaint of harassment related to sex was not well-founded. After hearing all evidence, the tribunal concluded the claimant did not establish unwanted conduct related to sex that violated her dignity or created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

The tribunal dismissed the victimisation complaint, finding it was not well-founded. The claimant did not establish that she was subjected to a detriment because she did a protected act or that the respondent believed she had done or might do a protected act.