Claimant v Red Everwhere (Lincolnshire) Limited t/a RedEverywhere
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded after a three-day hearing on the evidence and submissions presented. The claim was therefore dismissed.
The tribunal determined that the complaint of a breach of an equality clause under the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded after considering the evidence over three days. The claim was dismissed.
Facts
Ms Gilmour brought claims against her employer Red Everwhere (Lincolnshire) Limited for unauthorised deductions from wages and equal pay under the Equality Act 2010. The case was heard over three days by video hearing. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by a senior litigation consultant.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed both claims after a three-day hearing, finding that neither the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint nor the equal pay claim were well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant's equal pay and unlawful deduction claims were unsuccessful after a full merits hearing where the tribunal found the complaints not well-founded.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6021625/2024
- Decision date
- 17 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No