Claimant v Medical Aesthetic Supplies Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment.
Facts
Miss D West was dismissed by Medical Aesthetic Supplies Limited by reason of redundancy. She filed a claim in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 7 July 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal proceeded to determine the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
Decision
Employment Judge Cadney determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5732.25, making a default judgment in the claimant's favour because the respondent failed to respond to the claim.
Practical note
A respondent's failure to file a response on time allows the tribunal to make a default judgment under rule 21, awarding the claimant's redundancy payment claim without a hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1401870/2025
- Decision date
- 16 December 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No