Cases6000738/2024

Claimant v Applied Technology Developments Limited

16 December 2025Before Employment Judge R AdkinsonLeicesterin person

Outcome

Partly successful£3,738

Individual claims

Detrimentfailed

The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties and concluded that the claimant was not subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure. The claim was dismissed on its merits.

Automatic Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal concluded that the claimant was not automatically unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure. The whistleblowing element of the dismissal claim was rejected, though the dismissal itself was found to be unfair on ordinary grounds.

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent nonetheless unfairly dismissed the claimant under ordinary unfair dismissal principles. The tribunal awarded compensatory damages for loss of earnings, pension contributions, and loss of statutory rights.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The parties consented to judgment for notice pay in the sum of £1,485.75 gross, which the tribunal ordered by consent. This reflects the claimant's entitlement to contractual notice pay.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Applied Technology Developments Limited and his employment terminated on 30 November 2023. He brought claims for detriment and automatic unfair dismissal related to alleged protected disclosures (whistleblowing), as well as ordinary unfair dismissal and breach of contract for notice pay. The parties reached agreement on the notice pay claim during the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the whistleblowing-related claims, finding the claimant was neither subjected to detriment nor automatically unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures. However, the tribunal found the dismissal was nonetheless unfair on ordinary grounds and awarded compensation totaling £2,252.44 plus notice pay of £1,485.76 by consent.

Practical note

A dismissal can be ordinarily unfair even where the specific whistleblowing automatic unfair dismissal claim fails, and unrepresented claimants may still succeed on substantive unfair dismissal claims despite losing on more complex whistleblowing allegations.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£2,252
Notice pay£1,486
Pension loss£57
Loss of statutory rights£450

Case details

Case number
6000738/2024
Decision date
16 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No