Cases2304073/2025

Claimant v The Nail and Beauty Zone Limited

15 December 2025Before Employment Judge LeithLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Other

Facts

The Claimant Ms Wilson brought claims against The Nail and Beauty Zone Limited including allegations predating 26 November 2024. At a preliminary hearing on 11 December 2025, the Respondent applied to strike out the earlier allegations on time limit grounds, arguing there was no reasonable prospect of establishing a continuing act or just and equitable extension.

Decision

Employment Judge Leith dismissed both the Respondent's strike-out application and deposit order application, finding the Respondent had not established that there was no reasonable prospect of the Claimant showing the allegations formed part of a continuing act or that time should be extended on just and equitable grounds.

Practical note

Respondents face a high threshold when seeking strike-out on time limit grounds at preliminary hearings where there is potential for continuing act arguments or just and equitable extensions.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
2304073/2025
Decision date
15 December 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No
Rep type
self

Claimant representation

Represented
No