Cases8002163/2025

Claimant v Circet (UK) Ltd

15 December 2025Before Employment Judge A. TinnionScotlandremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wageswithdrawn

The claimant withdrew their wages claim under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which was then dismissed by the tribunal on withdrawal.

Unfair Dismissaldismissed on withdrawal

The claimant accepted that he was employed by the respondent for less than 2 years. Under ss.94-98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, employees require at least 2 years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, so the claim was dismissed as the claimant lacked the necessary qualifying service.

Facts

Mr Rhinehart brought claims against his former employer Circet (UK) Ltd for unlawful deduction of wages and unfair dismissal. He was unrepresented and appeared in person at a preliminary hearing conducted via video. The respondent did not attend. The claimant had been employed for less than two years.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims. The wages claim was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant accepted he had less than two years' continuous service, which is the statutory qualifying period required to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Practical note

Employees must have at least two years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and unrepresented claimants may withdraw or concede claims at preliminary hearings where the legal requirements are explained.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13Employment Rights Act 1996 ss.94-98

Case details

Case number
8002163/2025
Decision date
15 December 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No