Cases6002943/2025

Claimant v Newport City Council

11 December 2025Before Employment Judge S MooreNewport

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal heard the case over two days and determined that the dismissal was fair. The judgment states the claim is not well founded and is dismissed, indicating the respondent successfully defended the unfair dismissal claim.

Facts

Ms Braisby was employed by Newport City Council and was dismissed. She brought an unfair dismissal claim before the Employment Tribunal. The case was heard over two days in Newport in December 2025. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal found that the dismissal was fair and not unlawful. The unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The claimant was unrepresented while the respondent was represented by counsel.

Practical note

Without written reasons, this judgment provides limited learning value beyond confirming that a two-day hearing resulted in the council successfully defending an unfair dismissal claim brought by an unrepresented claimant.

Case details

Case number
6002943/2025
Decision date
11 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Name
Newport City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No