Cases6031690/2025

Claimant v XPLORE UK Distribution Ltd

11 December 2025Before Employment Judge HeapMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,215

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined under Rule 21 that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded the full amount claimed.

Facts

Lorena Ruiu brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages against XPLORE UK Distribution Ltd. The claim was filed in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 27 August 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit.

Decision

Employment Judge Heap determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £1,215.00 gross. The scheduled hearing for 16 January 2025 was cancelled.

Practical note

A respondent's failure to file a timely ET3 response can result in a default judgment under Rule 21, with the tribunal determining claims on the papers in the claimant's favour without a hearing.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£1,215

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure Rule 21

Case details

Case number
6031690/2025
Decision date
11 December 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No