Cases4102622/2025

Claimant v Royal Mail

11 December 2025Before Employment Judge E MannionScotlandin person

Outcome

Default judgment£6,282

Individual claims

Holiday Paysucceeded

The claim proceeded undefended. The claimant gave evidence about the payments due and provided supporting documents including screenshots of his annual leave entitlement. The tribunal accepted his evidence and awarded the holiday pay claimed.

Breach of Contractsucceeded

The claim for notice pay proceeded undefended. The claimant provided his contract of employment and gave evidence about notice pay due. The tribunal accepted his evidence and awarded the notice pay claimed as part of the total award.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The claim for unpaid wages proceeded undefended. The claimant provided payslips and bank statements to support his claim. The tribunal accepted his documentary evidence and oral testimony and awarded the wages claimed.

Facts

Mr Salah brought claims against Royal Mail for unpaid annual leave, notice pay and wages. The respondent did not participate in the hearing. The claimant appeared in person and provided documentary evidence including payslips, bank statements, screenshots of annual leave entitlement and his contract of employment to support his claims.

Decision

The tribunal accepted the claimant's uncontested evidence and awarded him £6,282.01 representing the total of his claims for annual leave, notice pay and wages. The claim proceeded as a default judgment with oral reasons given at the hearing.

Practical note

Employers who fail to defend claims for statutory payments risk default judgments where claimants can provide basic documentary evidence such as payslips and contracts.

Award breakdown

Case details

Case number
4102622/2025
Decision date
11 December 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No