Claimant v Dijla Limited t/a Domino's Pizza
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of harassment related to sexual orientation was not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but no written reasons are available from this judgment.
The tribunal found the complaints of victimisation were not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but no written reasons are available from this judgment.
The tribunal found the complaint of discriminatory constructive dismissal was not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing but no written reasons are available from this judgment.
Facts
Mr Tritschler brought claims against his former employer Dijla Limited trading as Domino's Pizza alleging harassment related to his sexual orientation, victimisation, and discriminatory constructive dismissal. The case was heard over three days in Cardiff with Mr Tritschler representing himself and the respondent represented by counsel. The tribunal heard oral evidence and submissions from both parties.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed all of Mr Tritschler's claims finding that the harassment related to sexual orientation, victimisation complaints, and discriminatory constructive dismissal were not well-founded. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing but these are not recorded in the written judgment.
Practical note
A litigant in person bringing multiple discrimination claims against a hospitality employer failed to prove any of his allegations of sexual orientation harassment, victimisation or discriminatory constructive dismissal after a full merits hearing.
Case details
- Case number
- 6006840/2025
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No