Claimant v TAMS Packaging Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded after a two-day full merits hearing. The tribunal heard evidence and submissions from both parties and determined that the respondent acted fairly in dismissing the claimant. The claim was dismissed in its entirety.
Facts
The claimant, P Doneo, brought a claim of unfair dismissal against TAMS Packaging Limited. The matter proceeded to a two-day full merits hearing before Employment Judge Caiden at Watford. The claimant appeared in person with the assistance of a friend, Mr Peter Pomfrett, while the respondent was represented by Mr Stuart Bennett. Oral reasons for the judgment were given at the hearing.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint, finding it was not well-founded. After hearing evidence and submissions over two days, the tribunal determined that the respondent had acted fairly in dismissing the claimant and the claim could not succeed.
Practical note
An unrepresented claimant's unfair dismissal claim was unsuccessful after a full merits hearing, with the tribunal finding the dismissal was fair.
Case details
- Case number
- 6012570/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No