Claimant v Anabas (UK2) Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The Tribunal heard the full merits case over three days. After considering all evidence and submissions, Employment Judge Baran found the complaint of unfair dismissal under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and dismissed the claim.
Facts
The Claimant M Orsivschi brought an unfair dismissal complaint against their former employer Anabas (UK2) Limited. The case proceeded to a full merits hearing over three days in August and December 2025. The Claimant represented themselves while the Respondent was represented by counsel. The hearing was conducted in hybrid format with the Claimant appearing by video and the Respondent initially attending in person.
Decision
Employment Judge Baran dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it not well-founded under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, with written reasons available upon request within 14 days.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant was unable to establish their unfair dismissal claim against a represented employer following a full contested hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3306437/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No