Claimant v Cantifix Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claim for unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but written reasons were not requested within the 14-day period, so the detailed reasoning is not available in this judgment.
The tribunal found the claim for breach of contract was not well founded and dismissed this claim. Reasons were given orally at the hearing but written reasons were not requested within the 14-day period, so the detailed reasoning is not available in this judgment.
Facts
Mr Moloney brought claims against Cantifix Ltd for unfair dismissal and breach of contract following the termination of his employment. The case was heard over four days by video hearing in December 2025. Reasons for the tribunal's decision were given orally at the hearing, but no party requested written reasons within the prescribed time limit.
Decision
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and awarded the claimant £22,437.50 in compensation. The breach of contract claim was dismissed as not well founded.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant successfully established unfair dismissal against a represented employer in the construction sector, but failed to prove breach of contract.
Award breakdown
Case details
- Case number
- 3307764/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Cantifix Ltd
- Sector
- construction
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No