Cases6002768/2023

Claimant v Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust

10 December 2025Before Employment Judge Rayneron papers

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Whistleblowingstruck out

The tribunal struck out the specific allegation that the respondent provided a negative reference to Weymouth Manor Care Home. The claimant's assertion was found to be inexplicably in conflict with contemporaneous documentation: the respondent denied receiving a reference request or providing a reference, and the care home confirmed the claimant was not offered work due to restructuring, not because of any reference. The tribunal concluded there was no reasonable prospect of proving the factual basis of this allegation.

Direct Discrimination(race)not determined

This claim continues to a full hearing listed for November 2025. No determination has been made at this stage.

Direct Discrimination(religion)not determined

This claim continues to a full hearing listed for November 2025. No determination has been made at this stage.

Facts

The claimant alleged she was subjected to whistleblowing detriment when the respondent NHS Trust provided a negative reference to Weymouth Manor Care Home, resulting in a withdrawn job offer. The claimant had a final written warning on file which the respondent admits was referenced in other references provided. However, the respondent denied ever receiving a reference request from or providing a reference to Weymouth Manor Care Home. Evidence from the care home stated the claimant was not offered work due to restructuring, not because of any reference.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the specific allegation regarding the Weymouth Manor reference, concluding there was no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant's factual assertion was found to be inexplicably in conflict with contemporaneous documentation from both the respondent and the care home. The remaining whistleblowing and discrimination allegations will proceed to a full hearing in November 2025.

Practical note

Strike out is appropriate even at a late stage where a claimant's factual assertion is demonstrably inconsistent with undisputed contemporaneous documentation, even in whistleblowing and discrimination cases where strike out is usually approached with caution.

Legal authorities cited

Balls v Downham Market High School [2011] IRLR 217Hussain v UPS UKEAT/0221/17/DMEzsias v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2011] IRLR 550 CATayside Public Transport Co Ltd t/a Travel Dundee v Reilly [2012] IRLR 755 CSRomanowska v Aspirations Care Ltd UKEAT/0015/14Ukegheson v Haringey London Borough Council [2015] ICR 1285Ahir v British Airways [2017] EWCA Civ 1392Kaul v Ministry of Justice [2023] EAT 41

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 38

Case details

Case number
6002768/2023
Decision date
10 December 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No
Rep type
self

Claimant representation

Represented
No