Cases8002274/2025

Claimant v Pulse Marketplace UK Limited

10 December 2025Before Employment Judge L CowenScotlandin person

Outcome

Default judgment£89,085

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal to be unfair. The respondent failed to attend the hearing to defend the claim. The respondent breached the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, warranting a 25% uplift.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant was owed unpaid wages from September 2023 to June 2025. The respondent failed to attend or contest the claim, and the claimant provided sufficient evidence of the deductions.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday pay at the time of termination. The respondent did not appear to contest this claim and the claimant established his entitlement.

Facts

The claimant was employed by Pulse Marketplace UK Limited until his employment was terminated in June 2025. He had not been paid wages from September 2023 to June 2025 and was owed accrued holiday pay at termination. The respondent did not attend the tribunal hearing and did not defend any of the claims.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims. The unfair dismissal claim succeeded with a 25% ACAS uplift for the respondent's failure to follow proper procedures. The claimant was awarded substantial unpaid wages covering nearly two years and outstanding holiday pay.

Practical note

Non-attendance by a respondent at a tribunal hearing typically results in a default judgment, and failure to follow ACAS Code procedures will result in a 25% uplift to unfair dismissal awards.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£3,177
Unpaid wages£72,111

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+25%

Respondent failed to abide by the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures, resulting in a 25% uplift to the unfair dismissal award

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

Case details

Case number
8002274/2025
Decision date
10 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No