Claimant v Three C's
Outcome
Individual claims
The claimant withdrew this part of his claim at the hearing.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have the required two years' continuous service to bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal.
Facts
Mr B Jones brought claims against two respondents, Three C's and Choice Support, for unpaid holiday pay and unfair dismissal. The first respondent, Three C's, had been dissolved and was removed from the proceedings. At the hearing the claimant withdrew his holiday pay claim.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant did not have two years' continuous service, which is a statutory requirement for bringing ordinary unfair dismissal claims under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
Practical note
A claimant must have at least two years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim, and claims against dissolved companies will be removed from proceedings.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 2304569/2024
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Three C's
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep