Cases6021650/2024

Claimant v London Underground Limited

9 December 2025Before Employment Judge AdkinLondon Centralin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Direct Discrimination(race)failed

The tribunal found that the claim for direct race discrimination pursuant to sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded. After hearing evidence over two days, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had established facts from which it could be concluded that less favourable treatment occurred because of race.

Facts

Mr P Walcott brought a claim of direct race discrimination against his employer, London Underground Limited. The case was heard over two days in person. The claimant was represented by his daughter, Ms R Walcott, while the respondent was represented by counsel, Ms L Whittington.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim for direct race discrimination, finding it not well founded. After considering the evidence presented over the two-day hearing, the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had established that any treatment he received was because of his race.

Practical note

Direct race discrimination claims require the claimant to establish facts from which the tribunal could conclude that less favourable treatment occurred because of race, and representation by family members does not prevent proper scrutiny of the evidence.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

EqA 2010 s.13EqA 2010 s.39

Case details

Case number
6021650/2024
Decision date
9 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep