Claimant v Total Home Delivery Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a response. The tribunal determined on the papers pursuant to rule 22 that the claimant's redundancy payment claim under Employment Rights Act 1996 section 135 was well founded based on the further information provided by the claimant.
Facts
Callum Edmunds was employed by Total Home Delivery Limited and was made redundant. He submitted a claim for a statutory redundancy payment to the Employment Tribunal. The respondent failed to present a response to the claim within the required timeframe.
Decision
The tribunal determined the claim on the papers under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 following the respondent's failure to respond. Based on further information provided by the claimant, the tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £6,947.20 calculated in accordance with section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Practical note
Employers who fail to engage with tribunal proceedings risk default judgments being entered against them on the papers without a hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3307684/2025
- Decision date
- 9 December 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No