Claimant v Cardiff Council

Claim from 2013 about defective vehicle refused permission to amend as preliminary issue, preventing it from proceeding to hearing.

Complaint about not being upgraded to Grade 4 after 4 years of driving in 2015 refused permission to amend, cannot proceed.

Complaints from 2017 to 2019 alleging being followed by supervisors refused permission to amend.

Complaint about manner of feedback and instructions by supervisors refused permission to amend.

Complaint from 2020 about not giving written feedback about HGV class 2 driving application refused permission to amend.

Complaint from 2020 about signing a written warning for tipping load early refused permission to amend.

Associative direct disability discrimination complaint from 2020 refused permission to amend.

Complaints from 2019, 2020 and 2021 about pay increments refused permission to amend.

Complaint about not speaking to the Claimant in simpler terms refused permission to amend.

Complaint about trailer training refused permission to amend.

Complaint about roll on roll off driver role in 2021 refused permission to amend.

Complaint about job opportunity offered to agency worker in 2021 refused permission to amend.

Complaint about refusal of Class 1 HGV training and Tesco comment in 2021 refused permission to amend.

Complaint from 2022/2023 about a defective vehicle refused permission to amend.

Complaint for period 2019 to 2021 about allocation of right hand drive vehicles struck out as having no reasonable prospect of being within time or securing just and equitable extension.

Complaint about written warning for tyre tread struck out as having no reasonable prospect of being within time or securing just and equitable extension.

Complaint about claimant's pay when driving the Arctic vehicle struck out as having no reasonable prospect of being within time or securing just and equitable extension.

Complaint about alleged comments by HR in dismissal meeting on 8 August 2024 granted permission to amend and can proceed to final hearing, subject to time limits being determined at that hearing.

Complaint that decision maker MW acted as he did because of what Claimant said at sickness absence meetings and thought Claimant was too much trouble, granted permission to amend and can proceed to final hearing.

Complaint that instead of dismissal the Claimant should have been redeployed to another department granted permission to amend and can proceed to final hearing, subject to time limits being determined.

Reasonable adjustment complaint about DP and class 2 HGV training in 2019 not struck out, respondent's strike out application refused, will be determined on merits at final hearing including time limit questions.

Complaint about handling of Claimant's sick leave and alleged pressures placed on the Claimant not struck out, will be determined on merits at final hearing including time limit questions.

Complaint about handling of Claimant's sick leave and alleged pressures placed on the Claimant not struck out, will be determined on merits at final hearing including time limit questions.

Complaint from June 2023 that Claimant was told he was no longer required to continue in Arctic role, allegedly less favourable treatment due to hip condition compared to comparator NC, allowed to proceed by amendment. Tribunal found links to dismissal and career progression issues, not as old as other rejected complaints, and was investigated in internal grievance. Application to strike out on time limit grounds refused, no deposit order made.