Claimant v T Gilmarten Limited
Outcome
Facts
The respondent applied to strike out the claimant's claim on grounds that it was vexatious, had no reasonable prospect of success, and the claimant had failed to comply with tribunal orders. The claimant had failed to complete the list of issues, file a schedule of loss on time, provided disclosure five months late, and filed his witness statement late. The claimant did not respond to the strike-out application. The tribunal considered the application on the papers.
Decision
The tribunal refused the respondent's strike-out application. While the claimant's behaviour was concerning, the judge concluded it was still possible to have a fair trial. The claimant had eventually made disclosure and filed a witness statement, and whether his evidence was sufficient would be determined at the final hearing.
Practical note
Poor compliance with case management orders alone will not result in strike-out if a fair hearing remains possible and the non-compliant party has eventually provided core materials like disclosure and witness statements.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3315339/2023
- Decision date
- 5 December 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No