Cases8000414/2025

Claimant v Logan Energy Ltd

5 December 2025Before Employment Judge B BeyzadeScotlandremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalfailed

The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal under section 100(1)(b) ERA 1996, which relates to dismissal for health and safety reasons, was dismissed by the tribunal after a full merits hearing. The tribunal found against the claimant on this claim.

Whistleblowingfailed

The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal under section 103A ERA 1996 for making protected disclosures was found not well founded. The tribunal concluded that the dismissal was not because the claimant made protected disclosures in the public interest.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The claimant's complaint of direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was found not well founded. The tribunal determined that the claimant was not treated less favourably because of disability.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed by Logan Energy Ltd and brought claims of automatic unfair dismissal on health and safety grounds under section 100(1)(b) ERA 1996, automatic unfair dismissal for whistleblowing under section 103A ERA 1996, and direct disability discrimination. The case was heard over six days by remote video hearing, with the claimant representing himself and the respondent represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed all three claims brought by the claimant. The tribunal found that the dismissal was not because of health and safety reasons, was not because of protected disclosures, and the claimant was not directly discriminated against because of disability. All claims were found not well founded.

Practical note

Self-represented claimants face significant challenges in proving automatic unfair dismissal claims for health and safety or whistleblowing reasons, and must establish clear causal links between the protected act and the dismissal.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.100(1)(b)ERA 1996 s.103AEqA 2010 s.13

Case details

Case number
8000414/2025
Decision date
5 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
6
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
energy
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No