Claimant v Mondelez UK Confectionery Production Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over four days and found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that direct race discrimination had occurred. The respondent's treatment of the claimant was found to have no connection to the claimant's race.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established that they were treated less favourably because of their religion or belief. The evidence did not support a finding that religion or belief was a reason for any treatment complained of.
The tribunal concluded that the conduct complained of did not relate to the protected characteristic of race and/or did not have the purpose or effect of violating the claimant's dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment in the required sense.
The tribunal found that the conduct complained of did not relate to the protected characteristic of religion or belief and/or did not have the purpose or effect of violating the claimant's dignity or creating the proscribed environment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010.
Facts
Dr Khan brought claims against Mondelez UK Confectionery Production Limited alleging direct discrimination and harassment on the grounds of race and religion/belief. The case was heard over four days before a full tribunal panel with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal unanimously dismissed all of Dr Khan's claims. The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts that would support findings of direct discrimination or harassment related to either race or religion/belief. Full oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
Self-represented claimants in discrimination cases face significant challenges in establishing the factual basis for their claims, particularly when opposed by represented respondents in full merits hearings.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1306125/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- manufacturing
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No