Claimant v LiveWest Homes Limited

The tribunal struck out the claimant's allegation of detriment on the ground of making a protected interest disclosure, related to the giving of references, on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the claimant did not have two years' continuous service with the respondent, which is required to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.

The redundancy payment claim was struck out on the basis that the claimant did not have two years' continuous service with the respondent.

The automatically unfair dismissal complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The breach of contract claim relating to notice was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The unlawful deductions from wages complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The claims in relation to other payments were not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so, therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

The race discrimination complaints were not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, therefore the claim was dismissed.