Cases3300139/2025

Claimant v Total Home Delivery Limited

Outcome

Default judgment£6,413

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. The tribunal considered the claimant's further written information and determined the redundancy payment claim was well founded under section 135 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, with a statutory redundancy payment calculated under section 162.

Facts

Mrs Howard brought a claim for a statutory redundancy payment against Total Home Delivery Limited. The respondent did not file a response to the claim. The claimant provided further written information to the tribunal to enable a determination of her redundancy payment entitlement.

Decision

The tribunal determined the claim on the papers under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 after the respondent's failure to respond. The redundancy payment claim was found to be well founded and the respondent was ordered to pay £6,413 calculated in accordance with the statutory formula.

Practical note

A default judgment under rule 22 can be entered where a respondent fails to respond, with the tribunal determining quantum based on the claimant's written evidence alone.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£6,413

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.135Employment Rights Act 1996 s.162Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 r.22

Case details

Case number
3300139/2025
Decision date
3 December 2025
Hearing type
rule 21
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No