Claimant v Total Home Delivery Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. The tribunal determined under rule 22 that the claim for redundancy payment was well founded based on further information provided by the claimant. The respondent was ordered to pay £17,850 calculated in accordance with ERA 1996 section 162.
Facts
Mr Younger was made redundant by Total Home Delivery Limited. He filed a claim for a statutory redundancy payment. The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. The claimant provided further information to the tribunal by correspondence.
Decision
The tribunal found the claim for redundancy payment well founded under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 and ordered the respondent to pay £17,850 within 14 days, calculated in accordance with section 162 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to file a response, tribunals can make a default judgment on properly documented redundancy payment claims under rule 22.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3300140/2025
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No