Cases6001277/2025

Claimant v D and G Café Ltd

2 December 2025Before Employment Judge S EdwardsLeedsremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£7,506

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal to be well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. However, the claimant was found to have caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct to a limited extent.

Facts

Mrs Hance was employed by D and G Café Ltd until her dismissal on 15 October 2014. The claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal. The respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary procedures. The claimant was found to have contributed to her dismissal through some blameworthy conduct.

Decision

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded. The respondent's failure to comply with ACAS procedures led to a 10% uplift in the compensatory award. However, the claimant's contributory conduct justified a 10% reduction to both basic and compensatory awards. The tribunal awarded a total of £7,505.82.

Practical note

Even where a claimant has engaged in some blameworthy conduct, an employer's procedural failures under the ACAS Code can still result in an unfair dismissal finding with an uplift, though both adjustments may be applied to reflect respective culpability.

Award breakdown

Basic award£6,231
Compensatory award£1,275

Adjustments

Contributory fault10%

The claimant caused or contributed to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct and it was just and equitable to reduce both the compensatory award and basic award by 10%

ACAS uplift+10%

The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.207AEmployment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
6001277/2025
Decision date
2 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No