Claimant v Regis Fuel Logistics LTD (In Compulsory Liquidation)
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under Rule 38 for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's letter of 28 October 2025 which warned of strike-out and invited explanation or a hearing request. The tribunal was satisfied the claim had not been actively pursued.
Facts
Mr D Watson brought an employment claim against Regis Fuel Logistics Ltd, a company in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal wrote to the claimant on 28 October 2025 warning that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued and inviting a response or hearing request. The claimant failed to respond to this letter.
Decision
Employment Judge Moore struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The judge was satisfied the strike-out was in accordance with the overriding objective and the claimant had been given proper opportunity to explain or request a hearing.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal correspondence, particularly strike-out warnings, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit even where the respondent is insolvent.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1600110/2025
- Decision date
- 2 December 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No