Cases3311677/2024

Claimant v Adugs Foods Ltd

1 December 2025Before Employment Judge Louise TaftWatfordremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed (not resigned) when the employer asked him to return company property after refusing to write a resignation letter. The respondent neither pleaded nor adduced any evidence of a fair reason for dismissal, and the employer expressly stated he did not intend to dismiss for capability.

Wrongful Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed without notice. With three complete years' service, he was entitled to three weeks' notice under s.86 ERA 1996. The respondent did not suggest the claimant committed gross misconduct that would justify summary dismissal.

Holiday Payfailed

The tribunal calculated that in the final holiday year (25 June 2024 to 16 August 2024), the claimant had accrued 4 days of holiday but had already taken 5 days in July 2024. Therefore there was no untaken accrued holiday at termination, and the claim failed.

Othersucceeded

The tribunal found that when proceedings began, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide written statement of employment particulars under s.1 ERA 1996. The respondent admitted this breach and never provided written particulars throughout the claimant's employment from June 2021.

Facts

The claimant was employed as a sales manager from June 2021 to August 2024. On 16 August 2024, following his return from sick leave after a holiday injury, the employer asked him to return his company car keys. A heated conversation followed in which the employer asked the claimant to write a resignation letter. When he refused, the employer told him to return all company property including laptop, tablet and scanner.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed, not resigned, because a reasonable employee would understand being asked to return all company property after refusing to resign as a dismissal. The unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the respondent pleaded no fair reason. The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded as he was entitled to three weeks' notice. The holiday pay claim failed as he had taken more holiday than accrued in the final holiday year.

Practical note

An employer who asks an employee to return company property after the employee refuses to write a resignation letter will be found to have dismissed them, even without using express words of dismissal.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13AERA 1996 s.86Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 2(1)Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 Article 5Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 14ERA 1996 s.95ERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
3311677/2024
Decision date
1 December 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
sales manager
Service
3 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor