Claimant v Ambulance Services 24 Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded £280.00.
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a statutory redundancy payment.
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined under rule 21 that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's accrued holiday entitlement and awarded £130.00.
Facts
The claimant R Brown brought claims against Ambulance Services 24 Ltd for unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay, and redundancy pay following dismissal by reason of redundancy. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time to the claim filed on 26 May 2025.
Decision
Employment Judge Rayner determined the claims under rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure due to the respondent's failure to respond. All three claims succeeded: unauthorised deductions (£280), redundancy payment (£1067.28), and holiday pay (£130), totalling £1477.28.
Practical note
Where a respondent fails to present a valid response on time, the tribunal may make a default judgment under rule 21 in favour of the claimant based on the particulars of claim.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6019542/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No