Claimant v City of London Academies Trust

The tribunal found that the complaints of detriment suffered on the grounds of making a protected disclosure were not well-founded, indicating that either no protected disclosure was made or the detriments alleged were not causally linked to any such disclosure.

The tribunal concluded that the complaint of automatic unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure was not well-founded, finding that the dismissal was not automatically unfair under whistleblowing provisions.

The tribunal determined that the complaints of direct race discrimination were not well-founded, finding no evidence of less favourable treatment on the grounds of race.

The tribunal found that the complaints of direct age discrimination were not well-founded, concluding there was no evidence of less favourable treatment on the grounds of age.

The tribunal concluded that the complaints of harassment related to race were not well-founded, finding that the conduct complained of did not constitute harassment related to the protected characteristic of race.

The tribunal determined that the complaints of harassment related to age were not well-founded, finding that the conduct did not constitute harassment related to the protected characteristic of age.

The tribunal found that the complaints of victimisation were not well-founded, concluding that the claimant was not subjected to detriment because of doing a protected act.