Claimant v Beulah Care Training and Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the claimant's claim for notice pay was not well-founded. The tribunal determined that the claimant was not entitled to payment in lieu of notice under his contract of employment or the applicable statutory provisions.
The tribunal found the claimant's claim for holiday pay was not well-founded. The claimant failed to establish that he was owed any accrued but untaken holiday pay at the termination of his employment.
The tribunal found the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was not well-founded. The tribunal was not satisfied that the respondent had made any unauthorized deductions from wages or failed to pay wages properly due to the claimant.
Facts
Mr Khokhar brought claims against Beulah Care Training and Services Limited, a healthcare training and services company, for notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay. The case was heard remotely via CVP at London South Employment Tribunal. Mr Khokhar was represented by Mr Kotecha, while the respondent was represented in-house by their Operations Manager, Mr Jobi-Stevens.
Decision
Employment Judge Wright dismissed all three claims brought by the claimant. The tribunal found that the claims for notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay were not well-founded and therefore failed in their entirety.
Practical note
Even with lay representation, claimants bringing wage-related claims must provide sufficient evidence to establish their entitlement to payment, as the tribunal will not award compensation where claims are not proven to be well-founded.
Case details
- Case number
- 2305047/2025
- Decision date
- 28 November 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- in house
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep