Claimant v I.C.T.S (UK) Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over three days and concluded that the complaint of direct race discrimination was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal heard evidence over three days and concluded that the complaint of direct religious discrimination was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal heard evidence over three days and concluded that the complaint of direct age discrimination was not well-founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Facts
Mrs R Williams brought claims of direct discrimination against I.C.T.S (UK) Limited on grounds of race, religion, and age. The case was heard over three days at Watford Employment Tribunal. The claimant was represented by her daughter, Ms Plummer-Walrond, while the respondent was represented by Mr R Ramsbottom, a senior litigation consultant.
Decision
Employment Judge French dismissed all three claims of direct discrimination, finding none of them to be well-founded. The tribunal gave oral reasons for its decision at the conclusion of the hearing.
Practical note
Multiple discrimination claims based on race, religion, and age can be brought together but require separate consideration and proof for each protected characteristic.
Case details
- Case number
- 3304697/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 3
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- technology
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep