Cases3200542/2024

Claimant v Shaw Trust Limited (The)

25 November 2025Before Employment Judge Massarellaon papers

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)succeeded

The Tribunal upheld a single claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments relating to the Respondent's failure to permit the Claimant to be accompanied by her stepmother to the redundancy consultation meeting on 12 December 2023. The reconsideration application did not alter this outcome.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The Tribunal dismissed the claim of direct disability discrimination. The Claimant did not successfully challenge this on reconsideration, and there was no reasonable prospect of varying or revoking the judgment.

Detriment(disability)failed

The Tribunal dismissed the claim of discrimination arising from disability (section 15). The Tribunal accepted the Respondent's justification defence. The reconsideration application was refused.

Facts

This is a reconsideration judgment following a liability hearing. The Claimant brought disability discrimination claims against her employer, a charity, in the context of a redundancy process. The Tribunal upheld one claim of failure to make reasonable adjustments relating to not being allowed to be accompanied by her stepmother at a redundancy consultation meeting on 12 December 2023, but dismissed other claims. Both parties applied for reconsideration of the liability judgment sent to them on 11 June 2025.

Decision

The Tribunal refused both reconsideration applications. The Respondent's application was based on a misreading of the judgment, confusing the December consultation meeting (which the Claimant attended and where the successful claim arose) with the November selection interview. The Claimant's application was an attempt to re-argue the case and raise claims not in the agreed list of issues. There was no reasonable prospect of varying or revoking the original judgment.

Practical note

Reconsideration applications must show it is necessary in the interests of justice to vary or revoke a judgment, not merely reargue the case or introduce claims not previously pleaded; finality in litigation is a fundamental principle.

Legal authorities cited

Lindsay v Ironsides Ray and Vials [1994] ICR 384Hindmarch v North East Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust [2025] EAT 87T.W. White & Sons Ltd v White UKEAT/0022/21Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489Liddington v 2Gether NHS Foundation Trust EAT/0002/16Outasight VB Ltd v Brown UKEAT/0253/14Flint v Eastern Electricity Board [1975] IRLR 277Ministry of Justice v Burton and anor [2016] EWCA Civ 714

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.19(2)(b)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 70(5)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 70(4)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 70(2)Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 68

Case details

Case number
3200542/2024
Decision date
25 November 2025
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
charity
Represented
No
Rep type
self

Claimant representation

Represented
No