Cases6011646/2024

Claimant v Linkline Transport Limited (in administration)

22 November 2025Before Employment Judge S GeorgeWatfordon papers

Outcome

Default judgment

Individual claims

Othersucceeded

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure, resulting in a default judgment in favour of the claimant. The specific nature of the claim will be determined at the remedy hearing.

Facts

The claimant G Adamczak brought a claim against Linkline Transport Limited, a company in administration, in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 13 September 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response within the required time limit. The Employment Judge determined that the claim could properly be decided without a response under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.

Decision

The Employment Judge granted a default judgment in favour of the claimant due to the respondent's failure to file a timely response. The claim succeeded in full, with the specific remedy to be determined at a separate remedy hearing.

Practical note

A respondent's failure to file a timely response to a tribunal claim will result in a default judgment being entered against them under rule 22, even where the company is in administration.

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
6011646/2024
Decision date
22 November 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No