Claimant v CTCH Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
This was an interim relief application under s.128 ERA 1996. The tribunal dismissed the application for interim relief, meaning the claimant did not establish a pretty good chance of succeeding at full merits hearing. The substantive claim remains to be determined.
The application for interim relief was dismissed. The tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant had a pretty good chance of succeeding in her complaint of automatic unfair dismissal at a full hearing.
Facts
Miss Raimundo brought a claim for automatic unfair dismissal against CTCH Limited and applied for interim relief under s.128 ERA 1996. She represented herself at the hearing, while the respondent was represented by a litigation consultant. The hearing was conducted remotely by video at Bristol.
Decision
Employment Judge O'Rourke dismissed the application for interim relief. The claimant failed to establish that she had a pretty good chance of succeeding in her complaint of automatic unfair dismissal at a full merits hearing. The substantive claim will proceed to a full hearing.
Practical note
Interim relief applications under s.128 ERA 1996 require claimants to demonstrate a pretty good chance of success at full hearing, a high threshold that is difficult to meet without detailed evidence at an early stage.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6037889/2025
- Decision date
- 20 November 2025
- Hearing type
- interim
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- CTCH Limited
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No