Cases6011539/2025

Claimant v The Cotswold Outpost

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claim was struck out because the claimant did not have the required two years of continuous service under s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

The claimant, Mr Swandon Bishop, was employed by The Cotswold Outpost for less than two years. He brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment indicates that the claimant had other complaints pending which were not affected by this judgment. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant did not have the required two years of continuous employment under s.108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's other complaints remain unaffected by this judgment.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years of qualifying service under s.108 ERA 1996, and claims without this will be struck out unless they fall within an automatic unfair dismissal exception.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
6011539/2025
Decision date
18 November 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No