Cases3307736/2024

Claimant v Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited

14 November 2025Before Employment Judge M WarrenNorwichin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Victimisationstruck out

The claim was struck out as an abuse of process because the claimant failed to apply to amend his original claim in good time when he was aware of the potential victimisation claim, had access to excellent legal advice, and knew amendments could be made. The tribunal held he had no reasonable prospect of persuading the tribunal it would be just and equitable to extend time given he sat on the claim until it was too late.

Facts

Mr Loverseed was employed by Virgin Atlantic as a pilot. He brought a claim in December 2020 for unfair dismissal and age discrimination arising from redundancies during Covid. He was re-employed as Senior First Officer in February 2022. He failed Command Assessment Process interviews in March and October 2023 for promotion to Captain. He believed he was victimised for having brought the original claim. He was represented by solicitors Farrer & Co and leading counsel throughout the original proceedings until December 2023. He did not apply to amend his original claim to include the victimisation complaints until June 2024, by which time the list of issues had been finalised and the case was ready for a 45-day hearing. His application to amend was refused and he issued fresh proceedings in July 2024, 8 months out of time.

Decision

The tribunal struck out Mr Loverseed's claim on two grounds. First, it was an abuse of process under Henderson v Henderson because he knew about the potential victimisation claim, had access to excellent legal advice, knew others were bringing similar claims, and failed to apply to amend his original claim in good time, waiting until three months after the list of issues was finalised. Second, he had no reasonable prospect of successfully arguing it would be just and equitable to extend time given the significant delay, his knowledge of the claim, his access to legal advice, and the abuse of process in bringing a fresh claim.

Practical note

A claimant represented by solicitors and counsel who fails to apply to amend existing proceedings to add new claims that arise during those proceedings, and instead waits until the claim is out of time to issue fresh proceedings, will have their claim struck out as an abuse of process with no reasonable prospect of a just and equitable extension of time.

Legal authorities cited

Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434Henderson v Henderson [1843] 3 Hare 100Johnson v Gore Wood and Co [2002] 2 AC 1 HLAgbenowossi-Koffi v Donvand Limited [2014] EWCA Civ 855Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 23Chief Constable of Lincolnshire v Caston [2010] IRLR 327Parker v Northumbrian Water Limited 2011 ICR 1172Foster v Bon Groundwork Limited 2012 ICR 1027Chaudhry v Royal College of Surgeons [2003] EWCA Civ 645London Borough of Haringey v O'Brien EAT 0004/16Szucs v Greensquareaccord Limited [2025] EAT110Mesuria v Eurofins Forensic Services Ltd [2025] EAT 103Southwark London Borough v Afolabi [2003] EWCA Civ 15HSBC Bank v Chevalier-Firescu [2024] EWCA Civ 1550Jones v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2024] EWCA Civ 1568

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.123

Case details

Case number
3307736/2024
Decision date
14 November 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Senior First Officer (Pilot)

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister