Cases6007575/2024

Claimant v Vista Home Care Services Ltd

12 November 2025Before Employment Judge BrainSheffieldremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£5,538

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissal(pregnancy)failed

The tribunal found that the reason or principal reason for the claimant's dismissal on 8 July 2024 was not related to her pregnancy, and therefore the claim under section 99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed.

Direct Discrimination(pregnancy)succeeded

The tribunal found that the respondent treated the claimant unfavourably because of her pregnancy and because of pregnancy-related illness, upholding her complaint under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010.

Facts

Miss Mcardle was employed by Vista Home Care Services Ltd and was dismissed on 8 July 2024 while pregnant. She brought claims for automatic unfair dismissal related to pregnancy and pregnancy discrimination. The tribunal heard evidence over two days by video. The claimant represented herself while the respondent was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the automatic unfair dismissal claim, finding that pregnancy was not the reason or principal reason for dismissal. However, the tribunal upheld the pregnancy discrimination claim under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010, finding that the respondent had treated the claimant unfavourably because of her pregnancy and pregnancy-related illness. The claimant was awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings plus interest.

Practical note

An employer can discriminate against a pregnant employee through unfavourable treatment even where pregnancy is not the principal reason for dismissal, requiring separate analysis under section 18 Equality Act 2010.

Award breakdown

Injury to feelings£5,000
Interest£538

Vento band: lower

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.99EqA 2010 s.18EqA 2010 s.39(2)(c)TULRCA 1992 s.207A

Case details

Case number
6007575/2024
Decision date
12 November 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No