Claimant v Rose Property Services Ltd
Outcome
Claimant fails
Facts
The claimant Mr M Chowdhury brought a claim against Rose Property Services Ltd. The case was listed for a hearing on 11 November 2025 by CVP. The claimant applied for a postponement but did not attend the hearing. The respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal considered the claimant's reasons for absence.
Decision
The tribunal refused the claimant's postponement application and dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-attendance. The tribunal considered all information provided by the claimant regarding his absence before making its decision.
Practical note
Claims can be dismissed under Rule 47 where a claimant fails to attend a hearing, even where reasons for absence have been provided to the tribunal.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 47
Case details
- Case number
- 2215359/2023
- Decision date
- 11 November 2025
- Hearing type
- dismissal on withdrawal
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- real estate
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No