Claimant v Bridgend County Borough Council
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the conduct complained of did not constitute sexual harassment under the Equality Act 2010. The claimants failed to establish that the behaviour was of a sexual nature as required for sexual harassment claims.
The tribunal upheld harassment related to sex claims in respect of two out of thirteen specific allegations. These two incidents were found to be unwanted conduct related to sex that violated the claimants' dignity or created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.
The claimants were unable to establish that they were treated less favourably than a comparator would have been treated because of their sex. The tribunal found the evidence did not support direct sex discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
Facts
Two female employees of Bridgend County Borough Council brought claims of sexual harassment, harassment related to sex, and direct sex discrimination. They brought thirteen specific allegations of harassment against the Council relating to workplace conduct and treatment.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the sexual harassment and direct sex discrimination claims but upheld two out of thirteen allegations of harassment related to sex. Each claimant was awarded £5,000 for injury to feelings plus interest, totalling £5,801.90 per claimant.
Practical note
Unrepresented claimants can succeed on harassment related to sex claims even where sexual harassment and direct discrimination claims fail, though success may be limited to specific incidents rather than a pattern of conduct.
Award breakdown
Vento band: lower
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1602489/2024
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 6
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Bridgend County Borough Council
- Sector
- local government
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No