Cases6020616/2025

Claimant v YourTeaching Ltd

10 November 2025Before Regional Employment Judge BurgherLondon Eastin person

Outcome

Default judgment£205

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The Respondent failed to present an ET3 response and did not proceed with its application for an extension of time. The tribunal found the claim for unpaid wages between August 2024 and October 2025 to be well founded under Rule 22 default judgment procedure.

Facts

Lorenzo Fuller claimed unpaid wages from YourTeaching Ltd for the period August 2024 to October 2025. The Respondent failed to submit an ET3 response form within the required time limit and did not proceed with an application for an extension of time. A director of the company, Mr Raphael, attended the hearing on 10 November 2025.

Decision

Regional Employment Judge Burgher entered default judgment in favour of the Claimant under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found the claim for unpaid wages to be well founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £204.94 in respect of unpaid wages and associated interest.

Practical note

Employers who fail to file an ET3 response and do not successfully apply for an extension of time will face default judgment, even if they attend the hearing with representation.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£205

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 Rule 22

Case details

Case number
6020616/2025
Decision date
10 November 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
No
Rep type
self

Claimant representation

Represented
No