Cases3311706/2021

Claimant v Haringey GP Group Limited trading as Charlton House Medical Centre

10 November 2025Before Employment Judge G TobinWatfordremote video

Outcome

Other

Individual claims

Direct Discriminationnot determined

This was a reconsideration hearing dealing solely with whether liability transferred under TUPE following the Sean Pong Tyres decision. The tribunal determined liability does not transfer to R1 where the alleged perpetrators' employment transferred but the claimants did not transfer. The substantive discrimination claims against R2, R3 and R4 remain to be determined.

Harassmentnot determined

As above, this reconsideration hearing addressed only the TUPE transfer of liability issue. The tribunal held that primary liability under the Equality Act for harassment by alleged perpetrators R2 and R4 does not transfer to R1 under TUPE regulations. The harassment claims against R2, R3 and R4 are unaffected.

Victimisationnot determined

This reconsideration concerned whether victimisation liability transferred under TUPE. Following Sean Pong Tyres, the tribunal held that employer's primary liability under the Equality Act arises in connection with the claimant's contract, not the perpetrator's contract, so does not transfer. R1 removed from proceedings; claims against R2, R3 and R4 continue.

Facts

Two claimants brought discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims against four respondents. R2 and R4 were alleged perpetrators employed by R3. R3 transferred the Charlton House Medical Centre business to R1 under TUPE around 29 September 2021. The claimants did not transfer. At an earlier hearing the tribunal held that R1 was liable under TUPE. This reconsideration followed the EAT decision in Sean Pong Tyres which changed the legal landscape.

Decision

Following reconsideration in light of Sean Pong Tyres, the tribunal reversed its earlier decision and held that liability for discrimination, harassment and victimisation does not automatically transfer to R1 under TUPE where the alleged perpetrators transferred but the claimant victims did not. The tribunal held that primary employer liability under the Equality Act arises in connection with the claimant's employment contract, not the perpetrator's contract. R1 was removed from proceedings.

Practical note

When a business transfers under TUPE, the transferee employer does not assume liability for Equality Act claims brought by non-transferring employees against transferring alleged perpetrators, because such liability arises in connection with the victim's contract, not the perpetrator's contract.

Legal authorities cited

Doane v Wimbledon Football Club Ltd & Ors, Sheffield County Court 02/12/2007Sohail v WFS Ground Handling Services Limited & ors ET Case No. 2400126/2017Martin v Lancashire County Council [2001] ICR 197Sunderland City Council v Brennan [2012] ICR 1183Sean Pong Tyres Limited v Moore [2024] EAT 1Bernadone v Pall Mall Services Groups Ltd and ors [2001] ICR 197

Statutes

Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, regulation 4(2)(a)Equality Act 2010 s.40Equality Act 2010 s.39Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, regulation 4(2)(b)

Case details

Case number
3311706/2021
Decision date
10 November 2025
Hearing type
reconsideration
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister