Cases6006801/2024

Claimant v Openreach Limited

9 November 2025Before Employment Judge VolkmerBodminhybrid

Outcome

Other

Facts

The claimant was employed as a Customer Service Engineer by Openreach from January 2012 to March 2024. He was diagnosed with ADHD as a child in 1995 and was stabbed in 2010, which led to PTSD symptoms. From 2021 onwards he experienced anxiety and depression, sought counselling and medication, and in 2023 became homeless following a relationship breakdown while caring for his young daughter.

Decision

The tribunal found the claimant was disabled by reason of ADHD, PTSD and anxiety throughout the relevant period (January 2023 to April 2024). The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that all three conditions had substantial adverse effects on day-to-day activities including mood swings, sleep disturbance, difficulty with finances, disorganisation, and concentration problems, and that these effects were long-term.

Practical note

A diagnosis of ADHD can itself be taken as evidence of substantial adverse effect on day-to-day activities, and tribunals should consider the Equal Treatment Benchbook guidance on neurodevelopmental conditions when assessing disability status.

Legal authorities cited

Mr Harry Stedman v Haven Leisure Ltd [2025] EAT 82J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] ICR 1052Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] ICR 302SCA Packaging Limited v Boyle [2009] ICR 1056All Answers Ltd v W [2021] EWCA Civ 606Seccombe v Reed in Partnership Ltd EA-2019-000478-00Ms A Robinson v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust [2025] EAT 39

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.6Equality Act 2010 Schedule 1Equality Act 2010 s.212

Case details

Case number
6006801/2024
Decision date
9 November 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
telecoms
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
Customer Service Engineer
Service
12 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No