Cases3302090/2023

Claimant v Compass Group UK and Ireland Ltd

7 November 2025Before Employment Judge DinWatfordin person

Outcome

Partly successful

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to properly consider reasonable adjustments for the Claimant in relation to the NPH ward hostess role. This failure led directly to the decision to dismiss and meant the investigation was flawed and the respondent's actions were outside the range of reasonable responses. The tribunal found the dismissal unfair despite acknowledging the respondent's efforts to consult, obtain medical advice, and trial the claimant in alternative roles.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)partly succeeded

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to properly consider the Claimant for the ward hostess role at Northwick Park Hospital. The feedback from NPH was not properly documented, was cursory, and contradicted by actions taken by NPH (extending trial, placing on rota). The tribunal found insufficient evidence that the respondent properly considered how to support the Claimant and came to conclusions without proper analysis of reasonable adjustments. Claims regarding occupational health referral timing, reception vacancy, helpdesk role and other roles failed.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)partly succeeded

The tribunal found that dismissing the Claimant was unfavourable treatment because of something arising from her disability (ability to only undertake light duties). The tribunal found this was not a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aim because the reasoning for dismissal was flawed due to the failure to properly consider reasonable adjustments for the NPH ward hostess role. This tainted the decision to dismiss and made it disproportionate. Claims regarding not deploying to full-time light duties position and subjecting to capability process failed as proportionate.

Facts

Claimant was a Domestic Assistant employed by Compass Group from March 2008 until dismissal in September 2022. In July 2020 she was diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome and underwent surgery. Medical evidence from October 2021 stated she required light duties indefinitely, unable to perform mopping, heavy lifting, stretching or vacuuming. The respondent placed her in temporary roles (door monitor, retail/kitchen) and trialled her as a ward hostess at Central Middlesex Hospital and Northwick Park Hospital. Following occupational health advice and various meetings, the respondent dismissed her on ill-health capability grounds, concluding no suitable permanent role could be found.

Decision

The tribunal found the dismissal unfair and the claims of discrimination arising from disability (dismissal only) and failure to make reasonable adjustments (NPH ward hostess role only) succeeded. The respondent failed to properly investigate and consider what reasonable adjustments could enable the Claimant to perform the NPH ward hostess role. The feedback was cursory, contradicted by NPH's actions in extending the trial and rostering the Claimant, and there was insufficient evidence the adjustments were economically unfeasible. This failure tainted the dismissal decision.

Practical note

Employers dismissing disabled employees on capability grounds must thoroughly investigate and properly consider reasonable adjustments for alternative roles, with clear documentation of why adjustments are not feasible; cursory feedback and inadequate analysis will render a dismissal unfair even where significant efforts have otherwise been made to retain the employee.

Legal authorities cited

Abernethy v Mott, Hay and Anderson [1974] ICR 323Garricks (Caterers) Ltd v Nolan [1980] IRLR 259Knightley v Chelsea & Westminster Hospital [2022] EAT 63Hampson v Department of Education and Science [1989] ICR 197 CAO'Brien v Bolton St Catherin's Academy [2017] EWCA Civ 145Woodcock v Cumbria Primary Care Trust [2012] ICR 1126 CAHeskett v Secretary of State of Justice [2020] EWCA Civ 1487Birtenshaw v Oldfield [2019] IRLR 946Carranza v General Dynamics [2015] IRLR 43Archibald v Fife Council [2004] UKHL 32Romec Ltd v Rudham [2007] All ER(D) (206)(Jul) EATBurke v College of Law [2012] All ER(D) 29Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic [2010] IRLR 744BS v Dundee City Council [2014] IRLR 131McAdie v Royal Bank of Scotland [2007] ECWA Civ 806

Statutes

EqA 2010 s.21ERA 1996 s.94ERA 1996 s.95ERA 1996 s.98ERA 1996 s.98(4)EqA 2010 s.15EqA 2010 s.20

Case details

Case number
3302090/2023
Decision date
7 November 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
No

Employment details

Role
Domestic Assistant
Service
15 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor