Cases3301604/2025

Claimant v DNATA

7 November 2025Before Employment Judge QuillLondon East

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant had less than two years continuous service. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires not less than two years service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out.

Facts

Mr Sangha was employed by DNATA for less than two years. He brought a claim for unfair dismissal. The respondent or tribunal identified that he did not have the requisite two years continuous service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

Employment Judge Quill struck out the claim on the basis that the claimant lacked the qualifying period of two years continuous employment necessary to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 ERA 1996. The claimant provided no acceptable reason for the claim to proceed.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims require two years continuous service, and claims without this qualifying period will be struck out unless the dismissal falls within an automatically unfair category.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
3301604/2025
Decision date
7 November 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
1
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
DNATA
Sector
transport
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No