Claimant v Track 24 Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the claimant's interim relief application had no reasonable prospect of success. The claimant acted unreasonably and vexatiously in bringing the application and in the way the proceedings were conducted. The application was dismissed.
Facts
Mr Bridges brought an interim relief application against Track 24 Limited and Dominic Cameron. The hearing was conducted remotely by video. Both parties were represented by counsel. The tribunal heard the interim relief application but found it had no reasonable prospect of success.
Decision
The tribunal dismissed the interim relief application, finding it had no reasonable prospect of success. The tribunal further found that the claimant had acted unreasonably and vexatiously in bringing the application and in conducting the proceedings, resulting in a costs order of £20,000 against the claimant in favour of the first respondent.
Practical note
Interim relief applications must have a reasonable prospect of success or claimants risk substantial costs orders for unreasonable and vexatious conduct.
Case details
- Case number
- 6013677/2025
- Decision date
- 6 November 2025
- Hearing type
- interim relief
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Name
- Track 24 Limited
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister